• info@termvisnyk.iul-nasu.org.ua
  • +38 (044) 278 43 90
  • ISSN 2221-8807
site Institute of the Ukrainian Language
» Journal Issues » 2021 » TERMINOLOGICAL REPRESENTATION OF THE «ВЛАДА» (“POWER”) CONCEPT: FRAME BASED ANALYSIS

TERMINOLOGICAL REPRESENTATION OF THE «ВЛАДА» (“POWER”) CONCEPT: FRAME BASED ANALYSIS

Olena Koliadenko

Information about the author:  Candidate of Philology, Junior Researcher, Institute of the Ukrainian Language of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine

e-mail: lekoliad@gmail.com

Title: TERMINOLOGICAL REPRESENTATION OF THE «ВЛАДА» (“POWER”) CONCEPT: FRAME BASED ANALYSIS

Rubric: PROBLEMS OF SOCIO-POLITICAL AND LEGAL TERMINOLOGY

Language: Ukrainian

Abstract: The concept of power is absolutely central to any understanding of society and human relations. Most people have an intuitive  notion of what it means. But what about scientists? How is the power defined in politology? What is the political term влада used for? What  are the features of this concept? The present study is aimed to answer, how the concept of power is represented in the scientific language of  politologists, which language means are used to represent this notion in the Ukrainian terminology.
The research of the concept “power” is carried out from the standpoint of cognitive terminology. It is based on several complementary methods and theoretical approaches, including, but not limited to the frame semantic theory and the theory of conceptual metaphor. Extensive lexical material was used for the investigation. The linguistic data of the study has been obtained from multiple sources such as  Ukrainian terminological dictionaries, encyclopedias and scientific texts (monographs, dissertations and scientific articles). The structure of  the politological concept “power” is modeled with the help of the frame. It consists of the following basic components (slots): “getting /  loosing”, “control”, “subject”, “object”, “instrument” and “result”. All of the slots are represented in the semantic structure of lexical units  used to nominate or describe the concepts. The peculiarities of their verbal representation are described.
The results obtained in the research may prove to be useful in a much broader context of studies – the inquiry into the principles of human categorization and conceptualization

Keywords: scientific linguoconceptology, politological concept, concept “power,” frame-based terminology, poltology (political scienc) terminology.

References

  1. Arutjunova, N.D. (1998). Jazyk i mir cheloveka. Moskva: Jazyki russkoj kul’tury (in Russ.)
  2. Boichuk, M.A. (2007). Vlada i hromadianske suspilstvo: mekhanizmy vzaiemodii [PhD thesis]. Natsionalnyi pedahohichnyi universytet  imeni M.P. Drahomanova, Kyiv (in Ukr.).
  3. Chernejko, L.O. (1997). Lingvo-filosofskij analiz abstraktnogo imeni. Moskva (in Russ.)
  4. Chudinov, A.P. (2004). Kognitivno-diskursivnoe issledovanie politicheskoj metafory. Voprosy kognitivnoj lingvistiki, 1, 91–105 (in  Russ.)
  5. Dovhyi, S.V. (2007). Osoblyvosti instytualizatsii politychnoi vlady v Ukraini [Synopsis of PhD thesis]. Odeska natsionalna yurydychna  akademiia, Odesa (in Ukr.).
  6. Haiduk, N.A. (2021). Prahmatychna dynamika aktualnykh kontseptiv politychnoi komunikatsii [Monohrafiia]. Mariupol: vyd-vo MDU  (in Ukr.).
  7. Holovatyi M.F. & Antoniuk O.V. (Eds.) (2005). Politolohichnyi slovnyk: Navchalnyi posibnyk dlia studentiv vyshchykh navchalnykh  zakladiv. Kyiv: MAUP (in Ukr.).
  8. Ionenko, D.A. (2011). Polityko-instytutsiini zasoby kontroliu pravookhoronnykh orhaniv hromadianskym suspilstvom [Synopsis of  PhD thesis]. Dnipropetrovskyi natsionalnyi universytet imeni Olesia Honchara, Dnipropetrovsk (in Ukr.).
  9. Ivashchenko, V.L. (2011). Kohnityvne terminoznavstvo. Terminolohichnyi visnyk, 1, 47–54 (in Ukr.).
  10. Kalinichenko, B.M. (2009). Vlada zasobiv masovoi informatsii: politolohichnyi analiz [Synopsis of PhD thesis]. Natsionalnyi  pedahohichnyi universytet imeni M.P. Drahomanova. Kyiv (in Ukr.).
  11. Karpova, K.S. (2008). Verbalizatsiia natsionalno-spetsyfichnykh kontseptiv amerykanskoho suspilstva XX – pochatku XXI stolittia  [Synopsis of PhD thesis]. Kyivskyi natsionalnyi universytet imeni Tarasa Shevchenka, Kyiv (in Ukr.).
  12. Kukuruz, O.V. (2008). Politychna opozytsiia v Ukraini ta Respublitsi Polshcha v umovakh demokratychnoi transformatsii: porivnialnyi  analiz [Synopsis of PhD thesis]. Instytut derzhavy i prava im. V.M. Koretskoho NAN Ukrainy, Kyiv (in Ukr.).
  13. Ledjaev, V.G. (2001). Vlast’: konceptual’nyj analiz. Moskva: “Rossijskaja politicheskaja jenciklopedija” (in Russ.).
  14. Lejchik, V.M. (2009). Terminovedenie: predmet, metody, struktur. Moskva: Librokom (in Russ.).
  15. Marchenko, Yu.V. (2005). Antyterorystychna diialnist yak skladova natsionalnoi bezpeky (politolohichyi analiz) [Synopsis of PhD  thesis]. Natsionalnyi Instytut stratehichnykh doslidzhen, Kyiv (in Ukr.).
  16. Minskij, M. (1979). Frejmy dlja predstavlenija znanij [translated by F.M. Kulakov]. Moskva: Mir (in Russ.).
  17. Mizhnarodna terminolohiia u sferi mihratsii: ukrainsko-anhliiskyi tlumachnyi slovnyk (2015) Retrieved from: https://iom.org.ua/sites/default/files/iom_migration_glossary_color_block_press.pdf (in Ukr.).
  18. Nekriach, A.I. (2003). Mistseve samovriaduvannia suchasnoi Ukrainy yak predmet politolohichnoho analizu [Synopsis of PhD thesis].  In-t polit. i etnonats. doslidzh. NAN Ukrainy, Kyiv (in Ukr.).
  19. Onishhenko, M.S. (2008). Nacional’naja specifika leksiko-frazeologicheskoj ob”ektivacii koncepta svobodnaja strana v russkom,  anglijskom i nemeckom jazykah [Synopsis of PhD thesis]. Voronezhskij gosudarstvennyj universitet, Voronezh (in Russ.)
  20. Pasechnik, O.V. (2007). Metaforicheskie obrazy sovremennogo mira, ob”ektiviruemye v politicheskih, jekonomicheskih i kul’turnyh  konceptah: na materiale nemeckogo gazetno-publicisticheskogo diskursa [Synopsis of PhD thesis]. Saratovskaja gosudarstvennaja akademija prava, Saratov (in Russ.)
  21. Raikovskyi, B.S. (2008). Vybory ta vyborchi systemy v konteksti transformatsiinoho rozvytku ukrainskoho suspilstva [Synopsis of PhD  thesis]. Mykolaivskyi derzhavnyi humanitarnyi universytet imeni Petra Mohyly, Mykolaiv (in Ukr.).
  22. Stepanenko, S.V. (2010). Vzaiemodiia orhaniv derzhavnoi vlady ta instytutsii hromadianskoho suspilstva v protsesi realizatsii  yevrointehratsiinoi polityky Ukrainy [Synopsis of PhD thesis]. Natsionalnii akademii derzhavnoho upravlinnia pry Prezydentovi Ukrainy, Kharkiv (in Ukr.).
  23. Surmin, Yu.P. et al. (2010). Entsyklopedychnyi slovnyk z derzhavnoho upravlinnia. Kyiv: NADU (in Ukr.).
  24. Trofimova, Ju.V. (2004). Koncept “politika” v russkoj jazykovoj kartine [Synopsis of PhD thesis]. Novosibirsk (in Russ.)
  25. Yaremko, Ya. (2012). Kontsept derzhava v ukrainskomu politychnomu dyskursi. Ukrainoznavchi studii, 13–14, 154–170 (in Ukr.).
  26. Zhulavska, O.O. (2011). Aktualizatsiia kontseptu TERORYZM u suchasnomu brytanskomu hazetnomu dyskursi [Synopsis of PhD  thesis]. Kharkivskyi natsionalnyi universytet im. V.N. Karazina, Kharkiv (in Ukr.).