• info@termvisnyk.iul-nasu.org.ua
  • +38 (044) 278 43 90
  • ISSN 2221-8807
site Institute of the Ukrainian Language
» Journal Issues » 2021 » SYNTHETIC TERMS OF UKRAINIAN MUSEUM SCIENCE IN THE CONTEXT OF THE POLYSEMY PHENOMENON

SYNTHETIC TERMS OF UKRAINIAN MUSEUM SCIENCE IN THE CONTEXT OF THE POLYSEMY PHENOMENON

Ivanna Fetsko

Information about the author: Candidate of Philological Sciences, Associate Professor at the Department of Applied Linguistic, Ivan Franko National University of Lviv

e-mail: ivanka_fly@ukr.net

Title: SYNTHETIC TERMS OF UKRAINIAN MUSEUM SCIENCE IN THE CONTEXT OF THE POLYSEMY PHENOMENON

Rubric: BRANCH TERMINOLOGY. SPECIAL LANGUAGE IN EDUCATION

Language: Ukrainian

Abstract: We have analyzed the phenomenon of polysemy in the Ukrainian term system of museum business, described the main types of  ambiguity of synthetic terms of professional language of museum officers, classified ambiguous terms units by different criteria and  identified specifics of their semantic structure.
In the modern terminology of museum work, there is a clear tendency to unambiguous terms. However, we have a significant number of  units that can nominate several concepts in this term system that was identified also in many others. The ambiguous units include exhibition, gallery, museum, museology, index, restoration, etc. The group of three-digit terms consists of the following units: museography, sudok, etc. The four-digit terms in museology occur in isolated cases, e.g. act, etc.
Three types of polysemy were identified in the studied terminological system based on the analysis of the semantic structure of the  multivalued terminological units present in the terminological system. They are: intrasystemic (it could appear as a result of metonymic transfers of names in the terminology of the museum case («collection of something – institution that keeps such a collection»: herbarium,  etc .; device – a building that has such a device”: planetarium, etc.) and metaphorical nomination (office – a room in the house or apartment  for classes, business conversations, etc. / variety of museum furniture, etc.), intersystem (intersectoral) (deposit (in museology, economics),  exposition (in museology, geography), shield (in museology, geology), etc.), and externally systemic (donation, dating) polysemy.
According to the structural composition, the derivative and non-derivative term units are distinguished among the multi-valued synthetic  terms of the professional language of museology. They are: a) terms – root units: act, gallery, legend, museum, shield, etc .; b) derived terms  – units formed by suffixation or prefixation: exhibition, subtext, etc.; c) complex terms: gallery-museum, lecturer-guide, museology,  museography, etc. The analysis of ambiguous synthetic terms of museum business indicates their distribution in this terminology, despite  the fact that polysemy is an undesirable phenomenon for term systems in general, that was evidenced by the requirements for «ideal» terms.

Keywords: polysemy, terminology of museology, synthetic term, semantic structure.

References

  1. Biian, N.R. (2012) Suchasna anhliiska terminosystema turyzmu v konteksti yavyshcha polisemii. Naukovyi visnyk Volynskoho  natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Lesi Ukrainky. Seriia: Filolohichni nauky. Movoznavstvo, 22 (247), 183–187 (in Ukr.).
  2. Boiarova, L.H. (2005). Polisemiia v ukrainskii muzychnii terminolohii. Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu im. V.N.  Karazina. Seriia: Filolohiia, 707, Vol. 46, 83–86 (in Ukr.).
  3. Hrybinyk, Yu.I. (2015). Yavyshcha polisemii ta omonimii v anhliiskii heodezychnii terminolohii. Molodyi vchenyi, 2(1),191–194 (in  Ukr.).
  4. Kliuchko, Yu.M. (2013). Muzeieznavstvo: slovnyk-dovidnyk. Кyiv: NAKKKiM (in Ukr.).
  5. Klymyshyn, O.S. (2003). Pryrodnycha muzeina terminolohiia: slovnyk-dovidnyk. Lviv: Derzhavnyi pryrodoznavchyi muzei NAN  Ukrainy (in Ukr.).
  6. Krasnopolska, N.L. (2010). Polisemiia v ukrainskii terminolohii menedzhmentu. Naukovi Zapysky Natsionalnoho universytetu  “Ostrozka akademiia”. Seriia: Filolohichna, Vol. 14, 362–370 (in Ukr.).
  7. Krymets, O.M. (2012). Polisemiia ukrainskykh tekhnichnykh terminiv. Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu im. V. N.  Karazina. Seriia: Filolohiia, 994, Vol. 64, 78–80 (in Ukr.).
  8. Kunch, Z. & Kharchuk, L. (2016). Polisemiia v ukrainskii elektroenerhetychnii terminolohii. Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu  “Lvivska politekhnika”. Seriia: Problemy ukrainskoi terminolohii, 842, 77–81 (in Ukr.).
  9. Liashuk, N.A. (2011). Prychyny bahatoznachnosti v linhvistychnii terminolohii. Filolohichni studii. Naukovyi visnyk Kryvorizkoho  derzhavnoho pedahohichnoho universytetu, 6, 318–324 (in Ukr.).
  10. Minenko, L.M. (Comp.), Karpova, V.V. (Ed.) (2013). Muzeieznavstvo: slovnyk bazovykh terminiv. Кyiv: Feniks (in Ukr.).
  11. Mykulchyk, R., Slobodian, P., Didenko, Ye. & Rak, T. (2012). Slovnyk-dovidnyk terminolohii muzeinytstva. Lviv: Vydavnytstvo Lvivskoi  politekhniky (in Ukr.).
  12. Nikulina, N.V. (2005). Stanovlennia suchasnoi ukrainskoi terminolohichnoi systemy avtomobilebuduvannia ta remontu transportnykh zasobiv [Synopsis of PhD thesis]. Kharkiv (in Ukr.).
  13. Onufriienko, H.S. (2007). Neoleksemy hibrydnoi pryrody v stylistychnii panorami blyzkosporidnenykh slovianskykh mov. In Leksyko-hramatychni innovatsii v suchasnykh skhidnoslovianskykh movakh : materialy III Mizhnar. nauk. konferentsii (pp. 39–42) (in Ukr.).
  14. Ovcharova, O.V., Yausheva-Omelianchyk, R. & Surhai, L. (2013). Slovnyk-dovidnyk muzeinoho pratsivnyka. Кyiv: KYI (in Ukr.).
  15. Rukolianska, N.V. (2015). Polisemiia v terminolohii kryminalno-protsesualnoho prava Ukrainy. Visnyk Dnipropetrovskoho universytetu. Seriia : Movoznavstvo, Vol. 23, Issue 21(3), 124–132 (in Ukr.).
  16. Shpylkivska, O.V. (2013). Yavyshche polisemii v terminolohii finansovoho prava. Naukovyi chasopysNatsionalnoho pedahohichnoho  universytetu im. M.P. Drahomanova. Seriia 9: Suchasni tendentsii rozvytku mov, Vol. 10, 289–295 (in Ukr.).
  17. Slovnyk ukrainskoi movy: v 11 t. (1971–1980) (Vols. I–XI). Кyiv: Nauk. dumka (in Ukr.).
  18. Solomakhin, A.F. (2012). Polisemiia v ukrainskii astronomichnii terminolohii. Naukovi pratsi Chornomorskoho derzh. un-tu im. Petra  Mohyly. Seriia: Filolohiia. Movoznavstvo, Vol. 195, Issue 183, 91–96 (in Ukr.).
  19. Symonenko, L.O. (1991). Formuvannia ukrainskoi biolohichnoi terminolohii: monohrafiia. Кyiv: Nauk. dumka (in Ukr.).
  20. Tsymbal, N.A. (2013). Polisemiia v ukrainskii terminolohii orhanichnoi khimii. In Terminolohichnyi visnyk (pp. 22–27). Kyiv: Instytut  ukrainskoi movy NANU (in Ukr.). Tymoshuk, R.P. (2011). Pro polisemiiu v polskii linhvistychnii terminosystemi. Filolohichni studii. Naukovyi visnyk Kryvorizkoho derzhavnoho pedahohichnoho universytetu, Vol. 6, 455–463 (in Ukr.).
  21. Veresh, M. & Syno, V. (2015). Polisemiia u nimetskii khrystyiansko-bohoslovskii terminosystemi. Aktualni pytannia humanitarnykh  nauk,Vol. 11, 110–114 (in Ukr.).
  22. Zakrenytska, L.A. (2013). Do pytannia polisemii ta omonimii u fakhovii terminolohii. Naukovi zapysky Natsionalnoho universytetu  “Ostrozka akademiia”. Seriia: Filolohichna, 36, 26–28 (in Ukr.).
  23. Zakrenytska, L.A. (2013). Do pytannia polisemii ta omonimii u fakhovii terminolohii. Naukovi zapysky Natsionalnoho universytetu  “Ostrozka akademiia”. Seriia: Filolohichna, 36, 26–28 (in Ukr.).