CONCERNING PROBLEMS OF THE MODERN TERMINOLOGY SCIENCE

Sergej Grinev-Grinevich

Information about the author: Doctor of Philology, Professor, State Higher Professional School in Suwalki, Suwalki, Poland

Elvira Sorokina

Information about the author: Doctor of Philology, Professor, Moscow State Regional University, Mytishchi-Moscow, Russia

e-mail:  svgrinev1@gmail.com, ellasor@mail.ru

Title: CONCERNING PROBLEMS OF THE MODERN TERMINOLOGY SCIENCE

Rubric: TERM AND LANGUAGE PRACTICE. PROFESSIONAL LANGUAGE PERSONALITY

Language: Russian

Abstract:The main problems of modern terminology science are being discussed. It is pointed out that due to various global processes (social, political,  informational, economical, intercultural, emigrational, etc.) and the number of quality terminological literature drastically dropped there is no methodical  coordination of terminological research. The authors suggest a number of promising directions of typological studies of national, branch and specialised
terminologies alongside with comparative interdisciplinary and multilingual analyses of special languages.

Keywords: term, terminology science, typological terminology science, comparative terminology science, promising directions of research.

References

1. Gaida, S. (1990). Wprowadzenie do teorii terminum. Opole (in Pol.).
2. Grinev, S.V. (1993). Vvedenie v terminovedenie. Moscow: Moskovskij licej (in Russ.).
3. Grinev-Grinevich, S.V. & Sorokina, E.A. (2018). Perspektivnye napravleniya razvitiya terminologicheskih issledovanij. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya: Lingvistika, 5, 18–28 (in Russ.).
4. Grinev-Grinevich, S.V. & Sorokina, E.A. (2021). K teoreticheskim i metodologicheskim osnovam sovremennogo terminovedeniya. In Konceptual’no-terminologicheskoe prostranstvo medicinskogo znaniya (pp. 21–28). Moscow: Moskovskij gosudarstvennyj mediko-stomatologicheskij universitet (in Russ.).
5. Grinev-Grinevich, S.V. (2006). Ocherednye zadachi otechestvennogo terminovedeniya. Nauchno-tekhnicheskaya terminologiya, Issue 1, 3–6 (in Russ.).
6. Grinev-Grinevich, S.V. (2012). Terminovedenie – proshloe, nastoyashchee i budushchee. Voprosy terminovedeniya, Issue 1, 4–14 (in Russ.).
7. Ipsen, G. (1924). Der alte Orient und die Indogermanen. In Stand und Aufgaben der Sprachvwissenschaft. Festschrift für W. Streitberg (pp. 200–237). Heidelberg (in Ger.).
8. Ivina, L.V. (2003). Lingvo-kognitivnye osnovy analiza otraslevykh terminosistem (na primere angloyazychnoi terminologii venchurnogo finansirovaniya). Moscow: Akademicheskij proekt (In Russ.).
9. Lantyukhova, N.N., Zagorovskaya, O.V. & Litvinova, Т.А. (2013). Termin: opredelenie ponyatiya i ego sushchnostnye priznaki. Vestnik Voronezhskogo instituta GPS MCHS Rossii, 1(6), 42–45 (in Russ.).
10. Myakshin, K.A. (2009). Raznoobrazie podhodov k opredeleniyu ponyatiya «termin». Al’manah sovremennoj nauki i obrazovaniya, 8 (27), Part 2, 109–11 (in Russ.).
11. Shelov, S.D. (1982). O yazykovoj prirode termina. Nauchno-tekhnicheskaya informaciya, Ser. 2, Issue 9, 1–6 (in Russ.).
12. Taranova, E.N. (2011). Problematika sovremennogo teoreticheskogo terminovedeniya, dostizheniya i nedostatki terminologicheskih issledovanij. Nauchnye Vedomosti Belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki, 24 (119), Issue 12, 142–149 (in Russ.).
13. Trzebinski, J. (1981). Tworczosc a struktura pojęć. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe (in Pol.).
14. Węsierska-Kwiecień, A. (2019). Anthropolinguistic study of the semantic field “work” [Manuscript]. Suwalki, PWSZ (in Eng.).
15. Witkowska, K. (2019). Analiza antropolingwistyczna pola semantycznego „sensitive / wrażliwy” [Manuscript]. Suwalki, PWSZ. (in Pol.)