ACTUAL PROCESSES IN MODERN UKRAINIAN ECONOMIC TERMINOLOGY

Viktoriia Tovstenko

Information about the author: Candidate of Philological Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor at the Department of Business Linguistics, Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman

e-mail: tovstenko.vika@ukr.net

Larysa Bondarchuk

Information about the author: Associate Professor, Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman

Tamara Podgurska

Information about the author: Senior Lecturer,  Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman

Title: ACTUAL PROCESSES IN MODERN UKRAINIAN ECONOMIC TERMINOLOGY

Rubric: BRANCH TERMINOLOGY. SPECIAL LANGUAGE IN EDUCATION

Language: Ukrainian

Abstract: The article examines one of the most pressing and complex problems of Ukrainian linguistics of the XXI century – the formation  of economic terminology on a national basis. The terminological vocabulary is an indicator of the level of development of scientific language  in society and, therefore, of science in general. Terminological vocabulary is the kind of barometer that determines the level of vocational  education, as rich and extensive terminology is one of the important indicators of the level of vocational education in the country. Standardization of economic terminology, defining its role in the formation of linguistic and professional competence of specialists in any  field of knowledge is the main problem today. The purpose of this article is to try to find out the types of lexical interference, to explore the  common features that define the essence of any term; to analyze terms with complete structural coincidence and terms with partial  replacement of components, designed by word-forming means of the recipient language; make terms-standards, terms-samples, normalize  the terminology; identify linguistic and linguistic reasons for borrowing. The dialectical method is used, empirical, empirical-theoretical and  theoretical methods. The article analyzes the history of Ukrainian economic terminology since the times of Kievan Rus, explains general and  specific features of terminological nomination of economic concepts, investigates the problem of mastering and transmitting foreign language elements, identifies types of lexical interference, gives common features that define the essence of any terminology units of special,  limited functioning; terms with complete structural coincidence and terms with partial replacement of components, designed by word- forming means of the recipient language are analyzed; Linguistic and linguistic reasons for borrowing have been identified. The general and  specific features of terminological nomination of economic concepts have been found out, which will facilitate the unification, standardization and codification of this terminology; the problem of assimilation and transfer of foreign language elements is investigated.  Conclusion. Standardization of terminological systems at national and international levels is necessary and relevant, since it aims at the choice of the terminological standard and its approval as a mandatory option. It is emphasized that an important aspect of the classification  of terminological units of the economic sphere is their word-forming features.

Keywords: lexical interference, standardization, international term, transliteration, transposition, linguistic picture of the world, borrowing, internationalisms, metaphorization, communicative obstacles, transphonation.

References

1. Bezpoiasko, O.K., Horodenska, K.H. & Rusanivskyi, V.M. (1993). Hramatyka ukrainskoi movy. Morfolohiia. Kyiv: Naukova dumka  (in Ukr.).
2. Chornovol, H.V. (2004). Novitnia ekonomichna terminolohiia ta yii stylistychne vzhyvannia v suchasnii ukrainskii movi (na materiali  periodychnykh vydan) [Synopsis of PhD thesis]. Kyiv (in Ukr.).
3. Duda, O.I. (2001). Protsesy terminolohizatsii v suchasnii anhliiskii movi (na materiali literatury z kredytno-bankivskoi spravy)  [Synopsis of PhD thesis]. Kyiv (in Ukr.).
4. Hrytskiv, A.V. (2004). Mizhsystemna vzaiemodiia yak chynnyk terminotvorennia (na prykladi anhlomovnykh finansovykh terminiv)  [Synopsis of PhD thesis]. Lviv (in Ukr.).
5. Kozlovets, I. (1997). Do pytannia formuvannia ukrainskoi finansovo-kredytnoi terminolohii (kinets XIX – poch. XX st.). In Ukrainska  terminolohiia i suchasnist (pp. 69–72). Kyiv (in Ukr.).
6. Kozlovska, L.S. & Tovstenko, V.R. (2009). Kultura naukovoi movy: navch.metod. posib. dlia samost. vyvch. dysts. dlia studentiv  redyt.-ekon. f-tu. Kyiv: KNEU (in Ukr.).
7. Lotka, O.M. (2000). Anhlomovna terminolohiia finansovo-ekonomichnykh vzaiemyn [Synopsis of PhD thesis]. Kyiv (in Ukr.).
8. Panko, T.I., Kochan, I.M. & Matsiuk, H.P. (1994). Ukrainske terminoznavstvo: pidruchnyk. Lviv: Svit (in Ukr.).
9. Sharata, N.H. & Kravchenko, T.P. (2019). Terminolohichna nominatsiia poniat ahrarnoho sektora ekonomiky. Molodyi vchenyi, 3(67), 128–132 (in Ukr.).
10. Vykhovanets, I.R. & Horodenska, K.H. (2004). Teoretychna morfolohiia ukrainskoi movy. Kyiv: “Pulsary” (in Ukr.).