Juxtaposed Terms in the Processes of Concept Nomination in the Field of Museology

Ivanna Fetsko 

Information about the author:  

Candidate of Philological Sciences, Associate Professor, Ivan Franko National University of Lviv

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9396-8608

e-mail: ivanka_fly@ukr.net

Title: Juxtaposed Terms in the Processes of Concept Nomination in the Field of Museology

https://doi.org/10.37919/2221-8807-2025-8-34

Rubric: Terminology of Humanities and Economic Sciences

Abstract: One of the important areas in terminology is the study of methods for creating new terms, as the analysis of term formation contributes to the systematization and harmonization of termino-logical systems. A productive method for creating terminological innovations in many languages is base-compounding (or composition) and word-compounding (or juxtaposition). In the modern terminological system of museology, juxtaposition represents a semantically and grammatically independent, full-fledged class of linguistic units that perform a nominative function. The article addresses the functioning of juxtaposed terms in the Ukrainian terminological system of museology. It examines the specifics of term formation through word-compounding and identifies the productive types of juxtaposition in the studied terminological system. A significant portion of these formations includes the following components: 1) museum: museum-workshop, museum-palace, museum-monument; 2) bulletin: bulletin-table, bulletin-chronicle; 3) library: library-depository; 4) hall: hall-epoch, hall-interior, hall-culture, etc. The quantitative relationship of juxtaposed terms from the lexical-thematic groups of museology was determined.

Keywords: Ukrainian language, museology, juxtaposed terms, word-compounding.

References:

Druzhbiak, S. (2010). Word formation in the creation of modern German economic terms]. Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu «Lvivska politekhnika». Seriia: Problemy ukrainskoi termi-nolohii, 675, 94–97 (in Ukr.).
Klymenko, N.F. (1998). Fundamentals of the Morphemics of Modern Ukrainian Language. Kyiv: IZMN (in Ukr.).
Klymyshyn, O.S. (2003). Science museum terminology: dictionary-reference book. Lviv: Derzhavnyi pryrodoznavchyi muzei NAN Ukrainy (in Ukr.).
Knyshenko, N.P. (2019). Terms in road construction created by combining roots and whole words]. Linhvistychni doslidzhennia, 50, 232–236 (in Ukr.).
Krasnopolska, N.L. (2019). The role of morphological word formation in the development of Ukrainian management terminology. Terminolohichnyi visnyk, 5, 174–181 (in Ukr.).
Loskutova, N.M. (2014). Juxtaposition terms in the film terminology systems of the French and Ukrainian languages. Naukovi zapysky Nizhynskoho derzhavnoho universytetu im. Mykoly Hoholia. Seriia: Filolohichni nauky, 1, 144–148 (in Ukr.).
Mykulchyk, R., Slobodian, P., Didenko, Ye., & Rak, T. (2012). Dictionary-reference book of museum terminology. Lviv : Vydavnytstvo Lvivskoi politekhniky (in Ukr.).
Minenko, L.M. (2013). Museology: dictionary of basic terms. Kyv: Feniks (in Ukr.).
Nikolaieva, A., & Fomina, L. (2010). The specifics of creating compound terms and juxtapo-sition terms in the terminology system of programming, computer networks, and information pro-tection. Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu «Lvivska politekhnika». Seriia: Problemy ukrainskoi terminolohii, 675, 38–41 (in Ukr.).
Pavlova, O.I. (2008). Word formation as one of the methods of term creation in English, French, Russian, and Ukrainian languages. Naukovyi visnyk Volynskoho natsionalnoho universyte-tu im. Lesi Ukrainky. Seriia: Filololohichni nauky, 2, 116−119 (in Ukr.).
Romanova, O. (2011). Root- and word-formation as a way of creating nominations in Ukrainian sewing terminology. Visnyk Cherkaskoho universytetu. Seriia: Filolohichni nauky, 213, 32–37 (in Ukr.).
Salamakha, M. (2012). The English term in the environmental protection sphere: a structural approach. Inozemna filolohiia, 124, 74–81 (in Ukr.).