• info@termvisnyk.iul-nasu.org.ua
  • +38 (044) 278 43 90
  • ISSN 2221-8807
» Subject Knowledge in the Translation of English Terminology

Subject Knowledge in the Translation of English Terminology

Титутл выпуску журналу
Print ISSN 1682-3540
e-ISSN 2707-5249
Subscription index 23920

Founders

National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine,
Institute of Ukrainian Language of NAS

Publisher

Institute of the Ukrainian Language of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine

Scientific journal Ukrainian Language is registered by the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine as print media (Certificate: Series КВ № 12180 – 1064 ПР of January 12, 2007).

Included in the list of printed scientific specialized editions of Ukraine (Order of MES of Ukraine no528 from 12.05.2015)




Back side of the journal

Subject Knowledge in the Translation of English Terminology

Leonid Chernovatyi 

Information about the author:  

Doctor of Sciences, Full Professor, Karazin National University (Kharkiv, UA) / Matej Bel University – UMB (Slovakia)

http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3411-9408

e-mail: leonid.m.chernovaty@meta.ua

Title: Subject Knowledge in the Translation of English Terminology

https://doi.org/10.37919/2221-8807-2025-8-38

Rubric: Term in the Text

Abstract: Based on the study of sources related to the problems of terminology translation, the author assumes that the accuracy of the rendering of specialised lexis in the target text depends on the scope of subject knowledge that is minimally required for its correct interpretation in the source text. The analysis of the target texts of a highly specialised English source text confirmed this assumption. In particular, the author found a certain similarity between the translation strategies of students with limited subject knowledge and the specifics of the operation of machine translation (MT) programs. In both cases, there are terminological errors associated with a lack of under-standing of the subject matter of the source text, resulting in the use of inappropriate equivalents in the target text. In situations of ambiguity, students with limited subject knowledge tend to accept the options offered by MT programmes, even when these options are inadequate. The article outlines prospects for further research.

Keywords: subject knowledge, terminology, translation

References:

Antia, B.E., Budin, G., Picht, H., Rogers, M., Schmitz, K.-D., & Wright, S. E. (2005). Shaping translation: A view from terminology research. Meta, 50 (4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.7202/019907ar
Beeby, A., Rodríguez, M., Fox, O., Neunzig, W., Orozco-Jutorа́n, M., Presas, M., Rodríguez-Inés, P., & Ramos, L. (2003). Building a translation competence model. In F. Alves, (Ed.): Triangulating Translation: Perspectives in Process-Oriented Research (pp. 43–66). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/BTL.45.
Biel, Ł. (2011). Professional realism in the legal translation classroom: translation competence and translator competence. Meta, 56(1), 162–178. https://doi.org/10.7202/1003515ar
Cabrе́, M.T. (2018). Terminology and translation. In Yves Gambier & Luc van Doorslaer (Eds.). Handbook of Translation Studies (pp. 356–365). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/hts.1.ter1.
Faber, P., & Reimerink, A. (2019). Framing terminology in legal translation. International Journal of Legal Discourse, 4, 15–46. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijld-2019-2015.
Göpferich, S. (2009). Towards a model of translation competence and its acquisition: The longitudinal study TransComp. Behind the Mind: Methods, Models and Results in Translation Process Research, 4(4), 11 37.
Hjort-Pedersen, M., & Faber, D. (2010). Explicitation and Implicitation in Legal Translation – A Process Study of Trainee Translators. Meta, 55(2), 237–250. https://doi.org/10.7202/044237ar
Lesznyák, M. (2007). Conceptualizing translation competence. Across Languages and Cultures, 8, 167–194. https://doi.org/10.1556/ACR.8.2007.2.2.
Lesznyák, M., Bakti, M., & Sermann, E. (2024). Reading takes it all? – the role of language competence and subject knowledge in legal translation. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer, 18, 192–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750399X.2024.2344177.
Mulyanah, A. (2020). The Strategy of Terminology Translation. Proceedings of the Twelfth Conference on Applied Linguistics (CONAPLIN 2019) (pp. 1–5.). Dordrecht: Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200406.001.
Noll, R., Frischen, L., Boeker, M., Storf, H., & Schaaf, J. (2023). Machine translation of standardised medical terminology using natural language processing: A Scoping Review. New bio-technology, 77, 120–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2023.08.004.
Polcz, K., Hamsovszki, S., Huszár, E., Jámbor, E., Szigetváry, N., & Válо́czi, M. (2023). Translation procedures in secondary term formation across languages in online glossaries: Univer-sal or language-specific? Across Languages and Cultures, 24(2), 239-256. https://doi.org/10.1556/084.2023.00400.
Pym, A. (2003). Redefining Translation Competence in an Electronic Age. In Defence of a Minimalist Approach, Meta, 47(4), 489 – 490. http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/008533ar
Qizi, P. (2024). Concepts of defining term and terminology including its difference with the word. International Journal of Advance Scientific Research, 4(3), 64–69. https://doi.org/10.37547/ijasr-04-03-14.
Ramos, P. (2024). Legal and institutional translator competence: developments and training implications. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer, 18, 139–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750399X.2024.2351780.
Ramos, P. (2024). Revisiting translator competence in the age of artificial intelligence: the case of legal and institutional translation. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer, 18, 148–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750399X.2024.2344942.
Rogers, M. (2015). Specialised Translation: An Orientation. In Specialised Translation. Palgrave Studies in Translating and Interpreting (pp. 20–42). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137478412_2
Schäffner, C., & Adab, B. (2000). Developing translation competence. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/BTL.38
Schneider, T. (1987). Terminotics of the future: Three scenarios. Meta, 32(2). 205-211. https://doi.org/10.7202/004047ar
Sun, X., & Chen, X. (2024). Review of Legal Terminology Translation Research. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 17(3), 343–348. https://doi.org/10.54097/1zy4e144.
Thelen, M. (2021). Relations between terms: a cognitive approach. The interaction between Terminology, Lexicology, Translation Studies and translation practice. Linguistica Antverpiensia, New Series – Themes in Translation Studies, 1, 193–209. https://doi.org/10.52034/lanstts.v1i.15
Wakabayashi, J. (1996). Teaching Medical Translation. Meta, 41(3), 356–365. https://doi.org/10.7202/004584ar
Widiastutik, S., Beratha, N.L.S., Rajeg, I.M., & Aryani, I. G. A. I. (2024). Exploration of nouns translation procedures in technological terminology. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, 8(6), 6983–7000. https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v8i6.3513.
Yao, C. (2024). The Components and Development of Translation Competence of Translator in the Information Age. Lecture Notes on Language and Literature, 7. 104–116. https://doi.org/10.23977/langl.2024.070716.