Term as Knowledge Case in Modern Global World: Some Tendencies of the Development

Iryna Kolesnikova

Information about the author: ScD Philology, Professor of Ukrainian Language and Literature Department, Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman (Kyiv, Ukraine)

e-mail: macar.chervechek@ukr.net.

Title: Term as Knowledge Case in Modern Global World: Some Tendencies of the Development

Rubric: Functional and Cognitive Terminology

Abstract: The term is appears to be the reservoir for information with clearly marked size, but it is possible to be interpretated as an applicant of scientific knowledge from which the trajectory of the reaserches, begins identified this vector of thought of a scientist. It is starting point for the further movement. On one hand, term becomes a catalyzer, that stimulates development of scientific research. On the other hand – one of the puzzles, from which consist intellectual fund of the certain country. It is important to identify if the correlation between the level of success of the brunch and formation of its terminology exists. Since the modern basis of terminology is not specyficaly inguistic discipline and not limited by it. It is the source of both material and intellectual basis of each country. Moreover it is very important to take into consideration business potential of the term, which is also a good that may realize itsels on the world markes as well as any other product. It is virtual “zero”, from which the economic and scientific cooperation is broadcasted. It is also a step for gaining investments. In triad term -invention-inventor, the last one gains the functions of contemproraty “prophit” and become the face not only the scientific school, but the whole country. Ukrainian field of terminology of direction depends on economical development and separate brunches of national economy. Since this development is not successful, the importance of Ukrainian terms reduces. As there a no significant achievements, there are no terms, that titles them. The term is the state representative of science development, its materialisation. To sum up, cognitive basis of terminology it is perspective linguistic direction, elaboration of which will allow to find answers for many complicated questions, which the most of the languages, and modern basic of terminology, which are actual for majority of the languages and modern basic of terminology in general.

Keywords: term, cognitive terminology, current problems of terminology, borrowed terms.

 References:

1. Golovanova, E.I. (2010). Bazovye kognitivnye ponyatiya i razvitie terminologii. Vestnik Udmurtskogo un-ta. Seriya “Istoriya i filologiya”, 2, 85–91 (in Rus).
2. Golovanova, E.I. (2011). Vvedenie v kognitivnoe terminovedenie. Moscow : FLINTA, NAUKA (in Rus).
3. Grinev,S.V. (2002). Kognitivnoe terminovedenie. Nauchno-texnicheskaya terminologiya, 1, 11–15. Moscow (in Rus.).
4. Ivashchenko, V.L. (2011). Kohnityvne terminoznavstvo: perspektyvy rozvytku. Terminolohichnyi visnyk: zb. nauk. prats,  1, 47–54. Kyiv : IUM NANU (in Ukr.).
5. Kolesnikova, I.A. (2009). Linhvokohnityvni ta komunikatyvno-prahmatychni parametry profesiinoho dyskursu [Synopsis of PhD thesis]. Kyiv (in Ukr.).
6. Filosofskyi entsyklopedychnyi slovnyk (2002). Kyiv : Abrys (in Ukr.).